Palabras clave
OCDE
educación
evaluación
revisión bibliográfica
redes bibliométricas
Cómo citar
Resumen
Las pruebas PISA de la OCDE representan en la actualidad un punto de referencia a la hora de evaluar los sistemas de educación. Esta prueba internacional suscita un gran interés y debate no solo en la opinión pública, sino en el ámbito académico, desde donde se publican investigaciones en diversas áreas de estudio. Por esta razón, el propósito de este artículo es analizar las tendencias de la literatura sobre las pruebas PISA para determinar la manera como ha sido abordada en los últimos 21 años en los artículos de revistas de investigación. El método utilizado consistió en una revisión bibliográfica a partir de la base de datos Scopus, que se complementa con un análisis de redes bibliométricas donde se analiza la coocurrencia de palabras, las revistas de mayor impacto, y un estudio sobre los autores y documentos más citados. El resultado de este texto es que, por un lado, los artículos se enmarcan principalmente en aspectos metodológicos, del impacto y del resultado de las pruebas y, por otro, que los artículos sobre PISA abordan en su mayoría estudios e investigaciones de países europeos, con baja incidencia en investigaciones de países latinoamericanos.
Referencias
Addey, C. (2017). Golden relics & historical standards: How the OECD is expanding global education governance through PISA for Development. Critical Studies in Education, 58(3), 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1352006
Agasisti, T., Gil-Izquierdo, M., y Han, S. W. (2020). ICT Use at home for school-related tasks: What is the effect on a student’s achievement? Empirical evidence from OECD PISA data. Education Economics, 28(6), 601-620. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2020.1822787
Anderson, J. O., Lin, H.-S., Treagust, D. F., Ross, S. P., y Yore, L. D. (2007). Using large-scale assessment datasets for research in science and mathematics education: Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 591-614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9090-y
Asil, M., y Gelbal, S. (2012). Cross-cultural equivalence of the PISA student questionnaire. Egitim ve Bilim, 37(166), 236-249.
Auld, E., Rappleye, J., y Morris, P. (2019). PISA for Development: How the OECD and World Bank shaped education governance post-2015. Comparative Education, 55(2), 197-219. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2018.1538635
Baird, J.-A., Johnson, S., Hopfenbeck, T. N., Isaacs, T., Sprague, T., Stobart, G., y Yu, G. (2016). On the supranational spell of PISA in policy. Educational Research, 58(2), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2016.1165410
Berliner, D. (2018). The implications of understanding that Pisa is simply another standardized achievement test. En Education by the Numbers and the Making of Society: The Expertise of International Assessments (pp. 127-146). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315100432
Bieber, T., y Martens, K. (2011). The OECD PISA Study as a Soft Power in Education? Lessons from Switzerland and the US. European Journal of Education, 46(1), 101-116. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2010.01462.x
Bray, M., y Kobakhidze, M. (2014). Measurement issues in research on shadow education: Challenges and pitfalls encountered in TIMSS and PISA. Comparative Education Review, 58(4), 590-620. https://doi.org/10.1086/677907
Brozo, W., Shiel, G., y Topping, K. (2007). Engagement in reading: Lessons learned from three PISA countries. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 51(4), 304-315. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.51.4.2
Bybee, R., y McCrae, B. (2011a). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518644
Bybee, R., y McCrae, B. (2011b). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518644
Versión Preprint
Panorama ISSN-L: 1909-7433 / E-ISSN: 2145-308X Vol 17 No 2(33) 2023
Carvalho, L., y Costa, E. (2015). Seeing education with one’s own eyes and through PISA lenses: Considerations of the reception of PISA in European countries. Discourse, 36(5), 638-646. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2013.871449
Çetin, B. (2010). Cross-cultural structural parameter invariance on PISA 2006 student questionnaires. Egitim Arastirmalari - Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 38, 71-89.
Chi, S., Liu, X., Wang, Z., y Won Han, S. (2018). Moderation of the effects of scientific inquiry activities on low SES students’ PISA 2015 science achievement by school teacher support and disciplinary climate in science classroom across gender. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1284-1304. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1476742
Correa-Betancour, M. (2016). El PISA y su impacto en la política educativa en los últimos dieciséis años. Pensamiento Educativo. Revista de investigación Educacional Latinoamericana, 53(2), 12.
Debeer, D., Buchholz, J., Hartig, J., y Janssen, R. (2014). Student, School, and Country Differences in Sustained Test-Taking Effort in the 2009 PISA Reading Assessment. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39(6), 502-523. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998614558485
Díaz, J. (2005). TIMSS Y PISA. Dos proyectos internacionales de evaluación del aprendizaje escolar en ciencias. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 2(3), 280-301.
Dohn, N. (2007). Knowledge and skills for PISA - Assessing the assessment. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2007.00542.x
Drechsel, B., Carstensen, C., y Prenzel, M. (2011). The role of content and context in pisa interest scales: A study of the embedded interest items in the pisa 2006 science assessment. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 73-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518646
El Masri, Y., Baird, J., y Graesser, A. (2016). Language effects in international testing: The case of PISA 2006 science items. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 23(4), 427-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1218323
Feniger, Y., y Lefstein, A. (2014). How not to reason with PISA data: An ironic investigation. Journal of Education Policy, 29(6), 845-855. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2014.892156
Fernandez-Cano, A. (2016). A methodological critique of the PISA evaluations. RELIEVE - Revista Electronica de Investigacion y Evaluacion Educativa, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.22.1.8806
Galvez, C. (2018). Co-word analysis applied to highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (2007-2017). Transinformacao, 30(3), 277-286. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892018000300001
Versión Preprint
Panorama ISSN-L: 1909-7433 / E-ISSN: 2145-308X Vol 17 No 2(33) 2023
Geidel, A. (2016). Pisa en la prensa española y su influencia sobre las políticas educativas. Opción, 32(8), 22.
Gilleece, L., Cosgrove, J., y Sofroniou, N. (2010). Equity in mathematics and science outcomes: Characteristics associated with high and low achievement on PISA 2006 in Ireland. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 475-496. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9199-2
Goldstein, H. (2004). International comparisons of student attainment: Some issues arising from the PISA study. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 11(3), 319-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000304618
González-Such, J., Sancho-Álvarez, C., y Sánchez-Delgado, P. (2016). Background questionnaires of PISA: A study of the assessment indicators. RELIEVE - Revista Electronica de Investigacion y Evaluacion Educativa, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.22.1.8274
Gorur, R. (2011). ANT on the PISA Trail: Following the statistical pursuit of certainty. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(SUPPL. 1), 76-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00612.x
Gorur, R. (2016). Seeing like PISA: A cautionary tale about the performativity of international assessments. European Educational Research Journal, 15(5), 598-616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116658299
Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA «effect» in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930802412669
Grek, S. (2010). International organisations and the shared construction of policy «problems»: Problematisation and change in education governance in Europe. European Educational Research Journal, 9(3), 396-406. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2010.9.3.396
Grisay, A. (2003). Translation procedures in OECD/PISA 2000 international assessment. Language Testing, 20(2), 225-240. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532203lt254oa
Grisay, A., De Jong, J. H. A. L., Gebhardt, E., Berezner, A., y Halleux-Monseur, B. (2007). Translation equivalence across PISA countries. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8(3), 249-266.
Gumus, S., y Atalmis, E. (2011). Exploring the relationship between purpose of computer usage and reading skills of turkish students: Evidence from PISA 2006. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 129-140.
Hatzinikita, V., Dimopoulos, K., y Christidou, V. (2008). PISA test items and school textbooks related to science: A textual comparison. Science Education, 92(4), 664-687. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20256
Hopfenbeck, T., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., y Baird, J. (2018a). Lessons Learned from PISA: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Articles on the Programme for
Versión Preprint
Panorama ISSN-L: 1909-7433 / E-ISSN: 2145-308X Vol 17 No 2(33) 2023
International Student Assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 333-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258726
Hopfenbeck, T., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., y Baird, J. (2018b). Lessons Learned from PISA: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Articles on the Programme for International Student Assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 333-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258726
Hopmann, S., Brinek, G., y Retzl, M. (Eds.). (2007). PISA According to PISA – Does PISA Keep What It (Lit Verlag). Lit Verlag.
Huang, X., Wilson, M., y Wang, L. (2016). Exploring plausible causes of differential item functioning in the PISA science assessment: Language, curriculum or culture. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 378-390. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.946890
Jeffries, D., Curtis, D., y Conner, L. (2020). Student Factors Influencing STEM Subject Choice in Year 12: A Structural Equation Model Using PISA/LSAY Data. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(3), 441-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09972-5
Jerrim, J., Lopez-Agudo, L., Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O., y Shure, N. (2017). What happens when econometrics and psychometrics collide? An example using the PISA data. Economics of Education Review, 61, 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.09.007
Jiang, F., y McComas, W. (2015). The Effects of Inquiry Teaching on Student Science Achievement and Attitudes: Evidence from Propensity Score Analysis of PISA Data. International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 554-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.1000426
Joaquim, P. (2011, enero 13). Qué explica el éxito mediático del Informe PISA. Escuela. http://www.ub.edu/histodidactica/images/documentos/pdf/exito_mediatico_informe_pisa.pdf
Kanes, C., Morgan, C., y Tsatsaroni, A. (2014). The PISA mathematics regime: Knowledge structures and practices of the self. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(2), 145-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9542-6
Kankaraš, M., y Moors, G. (2014). Analysis of Cross-Cultural Comparability of PISA 2009 Scores. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(3), 381-399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113511297
Karakolidis, A., Pitsia, V., y Emvalotis, A. (2016). Examining students’ achievement in mathematics: A multilevel analysis of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012 data for Greece. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 106-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.05.013
Kjærnsli, M., y Lie, S. (2011). Students’ preference for science careers: International comparisons based on pisa 2006. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 121-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518642
Versión Preprint
Panorama ISSN-L: 1909-7433 / E-ISSN: 2145-308X Vol 17 No 2(33) 2023
Knipprath, H. (2010). What PISA tells us about the quality and inequality of japanese education in mathematics and science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 389-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9196-5
Kubiatko, M., y Vlckova, K. (2010a). The relationship between ICT use and science knowledge for czech students: A secondary analysis of pisa 2006. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 523-543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9195-6
Kubiatko, M., y Vlckova, K. (2010b). The relationship between ICT use and science knowledge for czech students: A secondary analysis of PISA 2006. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 523-543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9195-6
Lee, Y.-H., y Wu, J.-Y. (2012). The effect of individual differences in the inner and outer states of ICT on engagement in online reading activities and PISA 2009 reading literacy: Exploring the relationship between the old and new reading literacy. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(3), 336-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.01.007
Lewis, S. (2017). Governing schooling through ‘what works’: The OECD’s PISA for Schools. Journal of Education Policy, 32(3), 281-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1252855
Lewis, S., Sellar, S., y Lingard, B. (2016). PISA for schools: Topological rationality and new spaces of the OECD’s global educational governance. Comparative Education Review, 60(1), 27-57. https://doi.org/10.1086/684458
Li, H. (2016). How is formative assessment related to students’ reading achievement? Findings from PISA 2009. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 23(4), 473-494. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1139543
Li, H., Lei, P., y Pace, C. (2013). Reading subskill differences between students in Shanghai-China and the US: Evidence from PISA 2009. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(6), 490-509. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2013.803439
Lindblad, S., Pettersson, D., y Popkewitz, T. (2017). INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS OF SCHOOL RESULTS: A Systematic Review of Research on Large Scale Assessments in Education. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23176.01286
Linnakyla, P., y Malin, A. (2008). Finnish students’ school engagement profiles in the light of PISA 2003. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(6), 583-602. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830802497174
Luzón, A., y Torres, M. (2013). PISA in the scientific literature and the international daily newspapers. Profesorado, 17(2), 193-224.
Mangez, E., y Hilgers, M. (2012). The field of knowledge and the policy field in education: PISA and the production of knowledge for policy. European Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 189-205. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.2.189
Versión Preprint
Panorama ISSN-L: 1909-7433 / E-ISSN: 2145-308X Vol 17 No 2(33) 2023
Márquez, A. (2017). A 15 años de PISA: Resultados y polémicas. Perfiles educativos, 39(156), 3-15.
Martens, K., Balzer, C., Sackmann, R., y Wexmann, A. (2004). Comparing governance of international organisations: The EU, the OECD and educational policy. En TranState Working Papers (N.o 7; TranState Working Papers). University of Bremen. https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/sfb597/7.html
Martin, A., Liem, G., Mok, M., y Xu, J. (2012). Problem solving and immigrant student mathematics and science achievement: Multination findings from the programme for international student assessment (PISA). Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1054-1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029152
Martins, L., y Veiga, P. (2010). Do inequalities in parents’ education play an important role in PISA students’ mathematics achievement test score disparities? Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 1016-1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.05.001
Mayorga, H. G., Vidal, J., y Vieira, M. (2017). El impacto del Informe PISA en la sociedad española: El caso de la prensa escrita. RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 23(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.23.1.9015
Meng, L., Qiu, C., y Boyd-Wilson, B. (2019). Measurement invariance of the ICT engagement construct and its association with students’ performance in China and Germany: Evidence from PISA 2015 data. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3233-3251. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12729
Merry, J. (2013). Tracing the U.S. Deficit in PISA Reading Skills to Early Childhood: Evidence from the United States and Canada. Sociology of Education, 86(3), 234-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040712472913
Morgan, C., y Shahjahan, R. A. (2014). The legitimation of OECD’s global educational governance: Examining PISA and AHELO test production. Comparative Education, 50(2), 192-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2013.834559
Neumann, K., Fischer, H. E., y Kauertz, A. (2010). From pisa to educational standards: The impact of large-scale assessments on science education in Germany. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 545-563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9206-7
OCDE. (2002). Informe PISA 2000. Conocimientos y aptitudes para la vida. Santillana. http://eduteka.icesi.edu.co/pdfdir/Pisa2000_Informe.pdf
OCDE. (2018a). Pisa for Schools. http://www.pisaparacentroseducativos.es/ppce.html
OCDE. (2018b). PISA para el desarrollo. Resultados en Foco. OCDE. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-for-development/PISA_D_Resultados_en_Foco.pdf
Versión Preprint
Panorama ISSN-L: 1909-7433 / E-ISSN: 2145-308X Vol 17 No 2(33) 2023
OCDE. (2019). PISA 2018 Results. Combined executive summaries. (OCDE). https://www.oecd.org/pisa/Combined_Executive_Summaries_PISA_2018.pdf
OCDE. (2020a). Acerca de la OCDE - OECD. https://www.oecd.org/acerca/
OCDE. (2020b). Early Learning and Child Well-being: A Study of Five-year Olds in England, Estonia, and the United States. OCDE. https://doi.org/10.1787/3990407f-en
OCDE. (2020c). PISA. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaenespaol.htm
Pereira, D., Perales, M., y Bakieva, M. (2016). Trends analysis in the investigations realised from the data of the PISA Project. RELIEVE - Revista Electronica de Investigacion y Evaluacion Educativa, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.22.1.8248
Perelman, S., y Santin, D. (2011). Measuring educational efficiency at student level with parametric stochastic distance functions: An application to Spanish PISA results. Education Economics, 19(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645290802470475
Perry, L., y McConney, A. (2010). Does the SES of the school matter? An examination of socioeconomic status and student achievement using PISA 2003. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1137-1162.
Petko, D., Cantieni, A., y Prasse, D. (2017). Perceived Quality of Educational Technology Matters: A Secondary Analysis of Students ICT Use, ICT-Related Attitudes, and PISA 2012 Test Scores. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(8), 1070-1091. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116649373
Pongratz, L. (2006). Voluntary self‐control: Education reform as a governmental strategy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(4), 471-482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00205.x
Rajchert, J., Zułtak, T., y Smulczyk, M. (2014). Predicting reading literacy and its improvement in the Polish national extension of the PISA study: The role of intelligence, trait- and state-anxiety, socio-economic status and school-type. Learning and Individual Differences, 33, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.04.003
Rautalin, M., Alasuutari, P., y Vento, E. (2019). Globalisation of education policies: Does PISA have an effect? Journal of Education Policy, 34(4), 500-522. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1462890
Rindermann, H., y Baumeister, A. (2015). Validating the Interpretations of PISA and TIMSS Tasks: A Rating Study. International Journal of Testing, 15(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2014.966911
Rinne, R. (2008). The Growing Supranational Impacts of the OECD and the EU on National Educational Policies, and the Case of Finland. Policy Futures in Education, 6(6), 665-680. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2008.6.6.665
Versión Preprint
Panorama ISSN-L: 1909-7433 / E-ISSN: 2145-308X Vol 17 No 2(33) 2023
Rutkowski, D., y Rutkowski, L. (2013). Measuring socioeconomic background in PISA: One size might not fit all. Research in Comparative and International Education, 8(3), 259-278. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2013.8.3.259
Rutkowski, L., y Rutkowski, D. (2016). A Call for a More Measured Approach to Reporting and Interpreting PISA Results. Educational Researcher, 45(4), 252-257. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16649961
Schleicher, A. (2007). Can competencies assessed by PISA be considered the fundamental school knowledge 15-year-olds should possess? Journal of Educational Change, 8(4), 349-357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-007-9042-x
Schuelka, M. J. (2013a). Excluding students with disabilities from the culture of achievement: The case of the TIMSS, PIRLS, and PISA. Journal of Education Policy, 28(2), 216-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2012.708789
Schuelka, M. J. (2013b). Excluding students with disabilities from the culture of achievement: The case of the TIMSS, PIRLS, and PISA. Journal of Education Policy, 28(2), 216-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2012.708789
Sellar, S., y Lingard, B. (2014). The OECD and the expansion of PISA: New global modes of governance in education. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 917-936. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3120
Sjøberg, S. (2015). PISA and global educational governance—A critique of the project, its uses and implications. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1310a
Sjøberg, S. (2017). Pisa testing: A global educational race? Europhysics News, 48(4), 17-20. https://doi.org/10.1051/epn/2017402
Solano-Flores, G., Contreras-Niño, L., y Backhoff-Escudero, E. (2006). Translation and adaptation of tests: Lessons learned and recommendations for countries participating in timss, pisa and other international comparisons. Revista Electronica de Investigacion Educativa, 8(2). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84892150148&partnerID=40&md5=6272d9c113566c449dccf8b6a0c52292
Spiezia, V. (2010). Does computer use increase educational achievements? Student-level evidence from PISA. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 127-148.
Steffens, K. (2014). ICT use and achievement in three European Countries: What does PISA tell us? European Educational Research Journal, 13(5), 553-562. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2014.13.5.553
Sullivan, K., McConney, A., y Perry, L. (2018). A Comparison of Rural Educational Disadvantage in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand Using OECD’s PISA. SAGE Open, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018805791
Versión Preprint
Panorama ISSN-L: 1909-7433 / E-ISSN: 2145-308X Vol 17 No 2(33) 2023
Sun, L., Bradley, K., y Akers, K. (2012). A Multilevel Modelling Approach to Investigating Factors Impacting Science Achievement for Secondary School Students: PISA Hong Kong Sample. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2107-2125. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.708063
Torppa, M., Eklund, K., Sulkunen, S., Niemi, P., y Ahonen, T. (2018). Why do boys and girls perform differently on PISA Reading in Finland? The effects of reading fluency, achievement behaviour, leisure reading and homework activity. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(1), 122-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12103
Vázquez-Cano, E., Gómez-Galán, J., Infante-Moro, A., y López-Meneses, E. (2020a). Incidence of a non-sustainability use of technology on students’ reading performance in Pisa. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020749
Vázquez-Cano, E., Gómez-Galán, J., Infante-Moro, A., & López-Meneses, E. (2020b). Incidence of a non-sustainability use of technology on students’ reading performance in Pisa. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020749
Waldow, F., Takayama, K., y Sung, Y.-K. (2014). Rethinking the pattern of external policy referencing: Media discourses over the «Asian Tigers» PISA success in Australia, Germany and South Korea. Comparative Education, 50(3), 302-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2013.860704
Wu, M. (2009). A comparison of PISA and TIMSS 2003 achievement results in mathematics. Prospects, 39(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-009-9109-y
Xu, D., y Dronkers, J. (2016). Migrant Children in Shanghai: A Research Note on the PISA-Shanghai Controversy. Chinese Sociological Review, 48(3), 271-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/21620555.2016.1165605
Zhang, D., y Liu, L. (2016). How does ICT use influence students’ achievements in math and science over time? Evidence from PISA 2000 to 2012. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2431-2449. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1297a
Zhao, Y. (2020). Two decades of havoc: A synthesis of criticism against PISA. Journal of Educational Change, 21(2), 245-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09367-x
Zhu, J., y Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123(1), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2023 Panorama