Cómo citar
Resumen
Este estudio procura identificar los aspectos orga- nizaciones que facilitan y dificultan la creatividad en el lugar de trabajo para determinar si existe algún concepto que se distingue o es relevante en una muestra de compañías colombianas selec- cionadas. Fueron entrevistados 52 directores ejecutivos, gerentes, supervisores y empleados de primera línea de ocho empresas establecidas en Colombia. Se aplicó la metodología de la teoría fundamentada. El análisis arrojó similitudes y dife- rencias: los temas destacados fueron envida y celos, pertenencia, creatividad intencional, normas del manejo de influencia y equidad.Referencias
Abrahamson, M. (1983). Social Research Methods. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in context. Colorado: Westview Press.
Amabile, T. M. y Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1988). Creative human resources in the RyD labo- ratory: How environment and personality affect innovation. En R.L. Kuhn (coordinador). Handbook for creative innovative managers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Amabile, T. M., Burnside, R. M. & Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1999). User’s manual for assessing the climate for creativity: A survey from the center for creative leadership. North Carolina: Center for Creative Leadership.
Andersson, B. y Nilsson, S. (1964). Studies of the reliability and validity of the critical inci- dent technique. Journal of Applied Psychology, 48(6), 398-403.
Anderson, N. R. y West, M. A. (1996). The Team Climate Inventory: Development of the TCI and its applications in teambuilding for innovativeness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 53-66.
Andriopoulos, C. y Dawson, P. (2009). Managing change, creativity and innovation. London: Sage.
Arksey, H. y Knight, P. (1999). Interviewing for social scientists. London: Sage.
Basadur, M. S. (1987). Needed research in creativity for business and industrial applica- tions. En S. G. Isaksen (coordinador). Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics. New York: Bearly.
Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, 4th ed. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
Bridges, W. (1991). Managing transitions: making the most of change. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and transla- tion of research instruments. En W. J. Lonner y J. W. Berry (coordinador.) Field methods in cross- cultural research. California: Sage.
Burnside, R. M., Amabile, T. M. & Gryskiewicz, S.S. (1988). Assessing organizational climates for creativity and innovation: methodological review of large company audits. En I. Yuji y R. L. Kuhn (coordinador). New directions in creative and innovative management: Bridging theory and practice. Cambridge. Massachusetts: Ballinger Publishing Company.
Cabra, J. F. (2006). An exploratory examina- tion of creative climate expectations among Colombian managers, supervisors and front- line employees and subsequent development of a measure to assess creative climate. An unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.
Charness, G. y Haruvy, E. (2000). Self-serving biases: evidence from a simulated labour rela- tionship. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(7), 655-667.
Child, J. (1981). Culture, contingency, and capitalism in the cross-national study of orga- nizations. En L. L. Cummings y B. M. Staw (coordinador). Research in organizational behavior. Connecticut: JAI Press.
Covey, S. R. (1989). The 7 habits of highly effective people: powerful lessons in personal change. New York: Fireside.
Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105-123.
Ekvall, G., Avrvonen, J. & Waldenström-Lindblad, I. (1983). Creative organizational climate: construction and validation of a measuring instrument (Report 2). Sweden: FA rådet. The Swedish council for management and organiza- tional behavior.
Firestien, R. L. (2004). Leading on the creative edge: Gaining competitive advantage through the power of Creative Problem Solving. Williamsville, NY: Innovation Resources.
Global Competitiveness Report (2001-2002). World Economic Forum and Harvard University. New York, Oxford University Press.
Hampden-Turner, C. y Trompenaars, F. (2000). Building cross-cultural competence: How to create wealth from conflicting values. Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Henry, J. (2001). Creativity and perception in management. London: Sage.
Herbig, P. y Dunphy, S. (1998). Culture and innovation. Cross-Cultural Management, 5(4), 13-23.
IBM Institute for Business Value (2010). Cultivating organizational creativity in an age of complexity. ibm Global Chief Resource Officer Study.
Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., Ekvall, G. & Britz (2000-2001). Perceptions of the best and worst climates for creativity: Preliminary vali- dation evidence for the situational outlook questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 13 (2), 171-184.
Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J. & Ekvall, G. (1999). Situational outlook questionnaire: A measure of the climate for creativity and change. Psychological Reports, 85, 665-674.
Jones, L. (1987). Barriers to effective problem solving. Creativity and Innovation Network, 10 (2). Manchester Business School, Manchester.
Jorgensen, J. J., Hafsi, T. & Kiggundu, M. N. (1986). Towards a market imperfections theory of organizational structure in developing coun- tries. Journal of Management Studies, 23(4), 417-442.
Kanter, R. M. (1984). The change masters. New York: Touchtone.
Lee, B. (1997). The Power Principle. New York: Simon Schuster.
Lemons, M. A. y Jones, C. A. (2001) Procedural justice in promotion decisions: using percep- tions of fairness to build employee commitment. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 16(4), 268-280.
Marin, G. y Marin, B. (1991). Research with Hispanic populations. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Maslow, A. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. New York: Viking.
Matisen, G. E. y Einarsen, S. (2004). A review of instruments assessing creative and innovative environments within organizations. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 119-140.
Miles, M. B. y Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded source- book, 2nd ed. California: Sage Publications.
Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied Imagination, 3rd ed. New York: Scribner’s Sons.
Pierce, J. L., Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L. & Dunham, R. B. (1989). Organization-based self-esteem: Construct definition, measure- ment, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 622-648.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310.
Schneider, S. (1988). National vs. corpo- rate culture: implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management, 27, 231-246.
Schutz, W. (1994). The human element. California: Jossey-Bass.
Siegel, S. M. y Kaemmerer, W. F. (1978). Measuring the perceived support for innovation in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 63: 553-562.
Strauss, A. L. y Corbin, J. (1990). Basic quali- tative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage Publications.
Sull, D. N. (November-December, 2003). Innovating around obstacles. What developing- world companies teach us about innovation. Strategy & Innovation, 3-6.
Thomas, K. W. y Kilmann, R. H. (1974). Thomas- Kilmann conflict mode instrument. New York: Xicom.
Vai-Lam, M. (1995) The economics of envy. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 26, 311-336.
Valencia, E.Y. (2000). Value orientations in Colombia: variations in age, gender, and SES: An empirical study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, Chicago, Illinois.
Van Gundy, A. (1987). Organizational creativity and innovation. En S. G. Isaksen (coordinador). Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics. New York: Bearly.
Williams, S. D. (2002). Self-esteem and the self-censorship of creative ideas. Personnel Review, 31(4), 495-503.
Los autores/as que publiquen en la Revista Panorama aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
- Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con Creative Commons: Reconocimiento - No Comercial -Sin Obra Derivada, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
- Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as a publicar su trabajo en Internet (por ejemplo en páginas institucionales o personales) antes y durante el proceso de revisión y publicación, ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos y a una mayor y más rápida difusión del trabajo publicado.
Panorama by Institución Universitaria Politécnico Grancolombiano is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Unported License.