How to Cite
Abstract
Este estudio procura identificar los aspectos orga- nizaciones que facilitan y dificultan la creatividad en el lugar de trabajo para determinar si existe algún concepto que se distingue o es relevante en una muestra de compañías colombianas selec- cionadas. Fueron entrevistados 52 directores ejecutivos, gerentes, supervisores y empleados de primera línea de ocho empresas establecidas en Colombia. Se aplicó la metodología de la teoría fundamentada. El análisis arrojó similitudes y dife- rencias: los temas destacados fueron envida y celos, pertenencia, creatividad intencional, normas del manejo de influencia y equidad.References
Abrahamson, M. (1983). Social Research Methods. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in context. Colorado: Westview Press.
Amabile, T. M. y Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1988). Creative human resources in the RyD labo- ratory: How environment and personality affect innovation. En R.L. Kuhn (coordinador). Handbook for creative innovative managers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Amabile, T. M., Burnside, R. M. & Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1999). User’s manual for assessing the climate for creativity: A survey from the center for creative leadership. North Carolina: Center for Creative Leadership.
Andersson, B. y Nilsson, S. (1964). Studies of the reliability and validity of the critical inci- dent technique. Journal of Applied Psychology, 48(6), 398-403.
Anderson, N. R. y West, M. A. (1996). The Team Climate Inventory: Development of the TCI and its applications in teambuilding for innovativeness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 53-66.
Andriopoulos, C. y Dawson, P. (2009). Managing change, creativity and innovation. London: Sage.
Arksey, H. y Knight, P. (1999). Interviewing for social scientists. London: Sage.
Basadur, M. S. (1987). Needed research in creativity for business and industrial applica- tions. En S. G. Isaksen (coordinador). Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics. New York: Bearly.
Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, 4th ed. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
Bridges, W. (1991). Managing transitions: making the most of change. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and transla- tion of research instruments. En W. J. Lonner y J. W. Berry (coordinador.) Field methods in cross- cultural research. California: Sage.
Burnside, R. M., Amabile, T. M. & Gryskiewicz, S.S. (1988). Assessing organizational climates for creativity and innovation: methodological review of large company audits. En I. Yuji y R. L. Kuhn (coordinador). New directions in creative and innovative management: Bridging theory and practice. Cambridge. Massachusetts: Ballinger Publishing Company.
Cabra, J. F. (2006). An exploratory examina- tion of creative climate expectations among Colombian managers, supervisors and front- line employees and subsequent development of a measure to assess creative climate. An unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.
Charness, G. y Haruvy, E. (2000). Self-serving biases: evidence from a simulated labour rela- tionship. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(7), 655-667.
Child, J. (1981). Culture, contingency, and capitalism in the cross-national study of orga- nizations. En L. L. Cummings y B. M. Staw (coordinador). Research in organizational behavior. Connecticut: JAI Press.
Covey, S. R. (1989). The 7 habits of highly effective people: powerful lessons in personal change. New York: Fireside.
Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105-123.
Ekvall, G., Avrvonen, J. & Waldenström-Lindblad, I. (1983). Creative organizational climate: construction and validation of a measuring instrument (Report 2). Sweden: FA rådet. The Swedish council for management and organiza- tional behavior.
Firestien, R. L. (2004). Leading on the creative edge: Gaining competitive advantage through the power of Creative Problem Solving. Williamsville, NY: Innovation Resources.
Global Competitiveness Report (2001-2002). World Economic Forum and Harvard University. New York, Oxford University Press.
Hampden-Turner, C. y Trompenaars, F. (2000). Building cross-cultural competence: How to create wealth from conflicting values. Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Henry, J. (2001). Creativity and perception in management. London: Sage.
Herbig, P. y Dunphy, S. (1998). Culture and innovation. Cross-Cultural Management, 5(4), 13-23.
IBM Institute for Business Value (2010). Cultivating organizational creativity in an age of complexity. ibm Global Chief Resource Officer Study.
Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., Ekvall, G. & Britz (2000-2001). Perceptions of the best and worst climates for creativity: Preliminary vali- dation evidence for the situational outlook questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 13 (2), 171-184.
Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J. & Ekvall, G. (1999). Situational outlook questionnaire: A measure of the climate for creativity and change. Psychological Reports, 85, 665-674.
Jones, L. (1987). Barriers to effective problem solving. Creativity and Innovation Network, 10 (2). Manchester Business School, Manchester.
Jorgensen, J. J., Hafsi, T. & Kiggundu, M. N. (1986). Towards a market imperfections theory of organizational structure in developing coun- tries. Journal of Management Studies, 23(4), 417-442.
Kanter, R. M. (1984). The change masters. New York: Touchtone.
Lee, B. (1997). The Power Principle. New York: Simon Schuster.
Lemons, M. A. y Jones, C. A. (2001) Procedural justice in promotion decisions: using percep- tions of fairness to build employee commitment. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 16(4), 268-280.
Marin, G. y Marin, B. (1991). Research with Hispanic populations. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Maslow, A. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. New York: Viking.
Matisen, G. E. y Einarsen, S. (2004). A review of instruments assessing creative and innovative environments within organizations. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 119-140.
Miles, M. B. y Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded source- book, 2nd ed. California: Sage Publications.
Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied Imagination, 3rd ed. New York: Scribner’s Sons.
Pierce, J. L., Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L. & Dunham, R. B. (1989). Organization-based self-esteem: Construct definition, measure- ment, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 622-648.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310.
Schneider, S. (1988). National vs. corpo- rate culture: implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management, 27, 231-246.
Schutz, W. (1994). The human element. California: Jossey-Bass.
Siegel, S. M. y Kaemmerer, W. F. (1978). Measuring the perceived support for innovation in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 63: 553-562.
Strauss, A. L. y Corbin, J. (1990). Basic quali- tative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage Publications.
Sull, D. N. (November-December, 2003). Innovating around obstacles. What developing- world companies teach us about innovation. Strategy & Innovation, 3-6.
Thomas, K. W. y Kilmann, R. H. (1974). Thomas- Kilmann conflict mode instrument. New York: Xicom.
Vai-Lam, M. (1995) The economics of envy. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 26, 311-336.
Valencia, E.Y. (2000). Value orientations in Colombia: variations in age, gender, and SES: An empirical study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, Chicago, Illinois.
Van Gundy, A. (1987). Organizational creativity and innovation. En S. G. Isaksen (coordinador). Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics. New York: Bearly.
Williams, S. D. (2002). Self-esteem and the self-censorship of creative ideas. Personnel Review, 31(4), 495-503.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Panorama by Institución Universitaria Politécnico Grancolombiano is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Unported License.