Sistemas dinámicos en la interacción emocional madre-hijo: primera fase
PDF (Spanish)

How to Cite

Sistemas dinámicos en la interacción emocional madre-hijo: primera fase. (2013). Panorama, 5(9). https://doi.org/10.15765/pnrm.v5i9.40

Abstract

Los avances en psicología de las emociones y psicología del desarrollo han exigido nuevos cambios tanto de orden teórico como metodológico para describir y explicar la variabilidad de las res-puestas infantiles a los cambios que tienen lugar en la dinámica socio-emocional con la madre. Producto de estas variaciones, aparece la integración de los sistemas dinámicos a las descrip- ciones de los teóricos del desarrollo emocional bajo supuestos psicobiológicos y sociobiológicos. Esta investigación indaga el posible uso de modelos de sistemas dinámicos en la generación de patrones de organización durante la interrelación socio- emocional madre-hijo, bajo cambios en los estados emocionales de la madre y bajo modificaciones debidas al desarrollo infantil. Los hallazgos de esta primera fase muestran algunas diferencias en las dinámicas socio-emocionales en cada uno de los estados emocionales maternos, al igual que regu- laridades en la variación por estado emocional. La investigación sugiere ampliar el marco teórico hacia modelos de componentes emocionales y modelos neurobiológicos, y la inclusión de modelos matemáticos de predicción y de análisis de series de tiempos.
PDF (Spanish)

References

Beebe, B. & Stern, D.N. (1977). Engagement-disengagementand early object experiences. En M. Freedman & S. Grand (Eds.), Communicative structures and psychic structures (pp.35-55). New York: Plenum.

Camras, L. A. (2000). Surprise!: Facial expressions can be coordinative motor structures. En M. Lewis & I. Granic (Eds.), Emotion, development and self- organization (pp. 100–124). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Camras, L. A. & Witherington, D. C. (2005). Dynamical systems approaches to emotional development. Developmental Review, 25, 328-350.

De Weerth, C. & van Geert, P. (2002). Changing patterns of infant behavior and mother–infant interaction: Intra- and interindividual variability. Infant Behavior & Development, número 24, 347–371.

De Weerth, C., van Geert, P. & Hoijtink, H. (1999). Intraindividual vari- ability in infant behavior. Developmental Psychology, número 35(4), 1102-1112.

Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expres- sions of emotion. En J. Cole (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 19. Current Theory and Research in Motivation (pp. 207–283). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Fogel, A. (1988). Cyclicity and stability in mother-infant face-to-face interaction: A comment on Cohn and Tronick (1988). Developmental Psychology, 24(3), 393-395.

Fogel, A. & Thelen, E. (1987). Development of early expressive and communicative action: Reinterpreting the evidence from a dynamic systems perspective. Developmental Psychology, 23(6), 747-761.

Fogel, A., Nelson-Goens, C., Hsu, H.-C. & Shapiro, A. F. (2000). Do different infant smiles reflect different positive emotions? Social Development, 9(4), 497-520.

Fogel, A., Nwokah, E., Dedo, J., Messinger, D., Dickson, K., Matusov, E., y cols. (1992). Social process theory ofemotion: A dynamic systems approach. Social Development, 1(2), 122–142.

Granic, I. & Lamey, A. V. (2002). Combining dynamic systems and multivariate analyses to compare the mother-child interactions of externalizing subtypes. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30(3), 265-283.

Hsu, H. & Fogel, A. (2003). Stability and transition in mother-infant face-to- face communication during the first 6 months: A microhistorical approach. Developmental Psychology, 39, (6), 1061-1082.

Izard, C. E. (1971). The face of emotion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Izard, C. E., Ackerman, B. P., Schoff, K. M. & Fine, S. E. (2000). Self-organization of discrete emotions, emotion patterns, and emotion-cognition relations. En M. D. Lewis & P. Granic (Eds.), Emotion, development, and selfor- ganization: Dynamic systems approaches to emotional development (pp. 15–36). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Izard, C.E. (1979). The maxi- mally discriminative facial move-ment coding system (Max). Newark, NJ: InstructionalResources Center, University of Delaware.

Kaye, K., & Fogel, A. (1980). The temporal structure of face-to-face communication between mothers and infants. Developmental Psychology, 16, 454–464

Lavelli, M., & Fogel, A. (2002). Developmental changes in mother–infant face-to-face communication: Birth to 3 months. Developmental Psychology, 38(2), 288–305.

Lavelli, M., & Fogel, A. (2005). Developmental changes in the rela- tionship between the infant’s attention and emotion during early face-to-face communication: The 2-month transi- tion. Developmental Psychology, 41(1), 265–280.

Lewis, M. D. (2000). The promise of dynamic systems approaches for an inte- grated account of human development. Child Development, 71 (1), 36-43.

Lewis, M. D. (2002). The dialogical brain: Contributions of emotional neurobi- ology to understanding the dialogical self. Theory & Psychology, 12(2), 175–190.

Lewis, M. D. (2005a). Bridging emotion theory and neurobiology through dynamic systems modeling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 169–245.

Lewis, M. D. (2005b). Self-organizing individual differences in brain devel- opment. Developmental Review, 25, 252–277.

Lewis, M. D. & Granic, P. (2000). Emotion, development, and selforganiza- tion: Dynamic systems approaches to emotional development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lewis, M. D. & Stieben, J. (2004). Emotion regulation in the brain: Conceptual issues and directions for developmental research. Child Development, 75(2), 371-376.

Lewis, M. D., & Todd, R. M. (2005). Getting emotional: A neural perspective on emotion, intention, and conscious- ness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, número 12, 210-235.

Lewis, M. D., Lamey, A., & Douglas, L. (1999). A new dynamic systems method for the analysis of early socio- emotional development. Developmental Science, 2 (4), 457-475.

Lewis, M. D., Lamm, C., Segalowitz, S. J., Stieben, J., & Zelazo, P. D. (2006). Neurophysiological correlates of emotion regulation in children and adolescents. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(3), 430-443.

Lewis, M. D., Zimmerman, S., Hollenstein, T. & Lamey, A. V. (2004). Reorganization in coping behavior at 1 1/2 years: Dynamic systems and norma- tive change. Developmental Science, 7(1), 56-73.

Messinger, D. S., Fogel, A. & Dickson, K. L. (2001). All smiles are posi- tive, but some smiles are more positive than others. Developmental Psychology, 37(5), 642-653.

Sander, D., Grandjean, D., & Scherer, K. (2005). A systems approach to appraisal mechanisms in emotion. Neural Networks, número 18, 317–352

Smith, L. & Thelen, S. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 7 (8), 343-348.

Thelen, E. & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Thelen, E. & Smith, L. B. (1998). Dynamic systems theories. En W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.). Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (pp. 563–634). New York: Wiley.

Von Salisch, M. (2001). Children’s emotional development: Challenges in their relationships to parents, peers, and friends. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25 (4), 310–319.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Licencia de Creative Commons


Panorama by Institución Universitaria Politécnico Grancolombiano is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Unported License.