Bibliografía y anexos

Nederhof, A. (2008). Policy impact of bibliometric rankings of research performance of departments and individuals in economics. Scientometrics, 74(1), 163–174. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-0109-0

Niu, F., Wang, D., & Wu, W. (2010). Analysis of current situation and trend research for universities and colleges’ performance evaluation. Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Xinxi Kexue Ban)/Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 35(Special Issue 2), 194–197. Retrieved from http://www.sinab.unal.edu.co:2066/record/display.url?eid=2-s2.0-78649685998&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&sid=95E894FE72E1AF193C2D7C89DF0B4EB2:10&sot=a&sdt=a&sl=176&s=(TITLE(research+AND+(assessment+OR+performance+OR+productivity))+AND+TITLE(university)+AND+TITLE-ABS-KEY(research+AND+(group+OR+team)))+AND+DOCTYPE(ar+OR+re)+AND+PUBYEAR+>-+1999&relpos=6&relpos=6&searchTerm=(TITLE(research+AND+(assessment+OR+performance+OR+productivity))+AND+TITLE(un

Observatorio_Colombiano_de_Ciencia_y_Tecnologia. (2011). Observatorio Colombiano de Ciencia y Tecnologia.

Opthof, T., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“ Leiden” ) evaluations of research performance. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 423–430.

Panaretos, J., & Malesios, C. (2009). Assessing scientific research performance and impact with single indices. Scientometrics, 81(3), 635–670. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2174-9

Parra-Dussán, C. (2013, July 12). Problemas en Colciencias. La República, pp. 1–3. Bogotá D.C.

Peña, A. (1995). La investigación científica en México. Estado actual, algunos problemas y perspectivas. Perfiles Educativos, 67, 1–10.

Pescador-Osuna, J. Á. (2012). Modificaciones al Sistema Nacional de Investigadores. In S. Vega_y_León (Ed.), Sistema Nacional de Investigadores Retos y Perspectivas de la Ciencia en México (Primera ed., pp. 1–204). México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.

Pineda, M. A. (2012). Entrevista para Informe de Estancia Sabática. In C. Topete-Barrera & S. P. Rojas-Berrio (Eds.), (p. 6). Bogotá: Universidad de São Paulo.

Pouris, A. (2007). The International Performance of the South African Academic Institutions: A Citation Assessment. Higher Education, 54(4), 501–509. doi:10.2307/29735127

Presidencia de la Republica de Colombia. (2002). Decreto 1279 de 2002. Bogotá D.C.

Prozesky, H., & Boshoff, N. (2011). Bibliometrics as a tool for measuring gender-specific research performance: an example from South African invasion ecology. Scientometrics, 90(2), 383–406. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0478-7

Restrepo-Cuartas, J. (2012, July 7). “No existe un respaldo real del gobierno a Colciencias.” Semana, pp. 1–6. Bogotá D.C.

Revilla, E., Sarkis, J., & Modrego, A. (2003). Evaluating Performance of Public-Private Research Collaborations: A DEA Analysis. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(2), 165–174. doi:10.2307/4101607

Rey-Rocha, J., Garzón-García, B., & José Martín-Sempere, M. (2007). Exploring social integration as a determinant of research activity, performance and prestige of scientists. Empirical evidence in the Biology and Biomedicine field. Scientometrics, 72(1), 59–80. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1703-2

Rey-Rocha, J., Garzón-García, B., & Martín-Sempere, M. J. (2006). Scientists ’ performance and consolidation of research teams in Biology and Biomedicine at the Spanish Council for Scientific Research. Scientometrics, 69(2), 183–212.

Rey-Rocha, J., Martín-Sempere, M. J., & Garzón, B. (2002). Research productivity of scientists in consolidated vs. non-consolidated teams: The case of Spanish university geologists. Scientometrics, 55(1), 137–155. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-19044388416&partnerID=40&md5=2e5b5bc0948ba6d5ff0618976967291f

RICYT. (2012). Red de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología Iberoamericana e Interamericana.Indicadores. Retrieved November 11, 2012, from http://www.ricyt.org/indicadores

RICYT. (2013). Indicadores. Retrieved from http://www.ricyt.org/index. php?option=com_content&view=article&id=149&Itemid=3

Rivas Tovar, L. A., & Aragón García, M. (2003). Panorama de la investigación en ciencias sociales En México. Análisis crítico y cuantitativo del Sistema Nacional de Investigadores. Revista Del Centro de Investigación, 5, 43–55.

Rodríguez, J. (2008). Evaluación del profesorado en universidades públicas. Una aproximación a la situación de Colombia. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 1, 46–66.

Rogers, J. D., & Bozeman, B. (2001). “Knowledge Value Alliances”: An Alternative to the R&D Project Focus in Evaluation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 26(1), 23–55. doi:10.2307/690119

Rojas-Luna, M. (2010). Clasificación de los grupos de investigación de la facultad de Ingeniería de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia, mediante la estimación de la eficiencia técnica utilizando análisis envolvente de datos. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Retrieved from http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/3848/1/02-822021.2010.pdf

Rons, N., De Bruyn, A., & Cornelis, J. (2008). Research evaluation per discipline: A peerreview method and its outcomes. Research Evaluation, 17(1), 45–57.

Rossiter, M. W. (1993). The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science. Social Studies of Science, 23, 325–341. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/285482?uid=3737808&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21102576843567

Rothausen-Vange, T. J., Marler, J. H., & Wright, P. M. (2005). Research Productivity, Gender, Family, and Tenure in Organization Science Careers. Sex Roles, 53(9-10), 727–738. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-7737-0

Rueda Beltrán, M. (2008). La evaluación del desempeño docente en la universidad. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, Especial, 1–15.

Sánchez-Torres, M., & Pérez-Vargas, P. (2013). Desde sus inicios: El trasegar de Colciencias en la promoción de la innovación. In Observatorio_Colombiano_de_Ciencia_y_Tecnología (Ed.), Colciencias: Entre la legitimidad, la normatividad y la práctica – Historia de un ONCyT. Bogotá D.C.: Observatorio Colombiano de Ciencia y Tecnología.

Santamaría-delgado, C., Hernández, N. C., David, J., Betancur, G., Ospina, M. S., & Serrato, S. M. (2011). La productividad de las artes en las universidades colombianas : desafíos a los mecanismos de medición del conocimiento, 87–116.

Saxena, A., Gupta, B. M., & Jauhari, M. (2011). Research Performance of Top Engineering and Technological Institutes of India : A Comparison of Indices, 31(5), 377–381.

Secretaría de Gobernación. Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (1984). México: Diario Oficial de la Federación.

Sevukan, R., & Sharma, J. (2008). Bibliometric Analysis of Research Output of Biotechnology Faculties in Some Indian Central Universities. Journal of Library & Information Technology, 28(6), 11–20.

Smart, W. (2008). The impact of the performance-based research fund on the research productivity of New Zealand universities. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 34, 136–152.

Sombatsompop, N., Markpin, T., Yochai, W., & Saechiew, M. (2005). An evaluation of research performance for different subject categories using Impact Factor Point Average ( IFPA ) index: Thailand case study. Scientometrics, 65(3), 293–305.

Taylor, J. (2011). The Assessment of Research Quality in UK Universities: Peer Review or Metrics? British Journal of Management, 22, 202–217. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00722.x

Tien, F. F. (2007). To what degree does the promotion system reward faculty research productivity? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(1), 105–123. doi:10.1080/01425690600996741

Topete-Barrera, C. (2012). Efectos y desafíos de las políticas de productividad para los grupos de investigación científica, sus procesos de formación y producción escrita (p. 168). Ciudad de México: Taller Abierto.

Valadkhani, A., & Ville, S. (2010). Ranking and clustering of the faculties of commerce research performance in Australia. Applied Economics, 42(22), 2881–2895. doi:10.1080/00036840801964674

Valadkhani, A., & Worthington, A. (2006). Ranking and Clustering Australian University Research Performance, 1998–2002. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(2), 189–210. doi:10.1080/13600800600751101

Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Modelling of bibliometric approaches and importance of output verification in research performance assessment, 16(2), 93–106.

Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Testing the validity of the Hirsch-index for research assessment purposes. Research Evaluation, 17(2), 157–160. doi:10.3152/095820208X319175

Van Leeuwen, T., Costas, R., Calero-Medina, C., & Visser, M. (2012). The role of editorial material in bibliometric research performance assessments. Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0904-5

Van Leeuwen, T., Moed, H. F., Tijssen, R. J. W., Visser, M. S., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics, 51(1), 335–346.

Van Looy, B., Debackere, K., Callaert, J., Tijssen, R., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Scientific capabilities and technological performance of national innovation systems: An exploration of emerging industrial relevant research domains. Scientometrics, 66(2), 295–310. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0030-3

Van Raan, A. (2006a). Comparison of the hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics, 67(3), 491–502. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33748655746&partnerID=40&md5=b8eb21d6b18d9e32bbf015d59b6e1e6f

Van Raan, A. (2006b). Performance-Related Differences of Bibliometric Statistical Properties of Research Groups: Cumulative Advantages and Hierarchically Layered Networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(14), 1919–1935. doi:10.1002/asi

Van Raan, A. F. J. (2012). Properties of journal impact in relation to bibliometric research group performance indicators. Scientometrics, 92(2), 457–469. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0747-0

Varios. San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) (2012). Retrieved from http://am.ascb.org/dora/

Vega-Rodríguez, R. A. (2012). Entrevista para Informe de Estancia Sabática. In C. Topete-Barrera & S. P. Rojas-Berrio (Eds.), (p. 2). Bogotá: Universidad de São Paulo.

Villaveces-Cardoso, J. L. (2005). Prospectiva de investigación en la universidad colombiana. Revista de Estudios Sociales, (22), 169–181. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=S0123-885X2005000300004&script=sci_arttext&tlng=pt

Wang, M.-H., Yu, T.-C., & Ho, Y.-S. (2009). A bibliometric analysis of the performance of Water Research. Scientometrics, 84(3), 813–820. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0112-0

Watts, G. (2009). Beyond the Impact Factor. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 338(7692), 440–441. doi:10.2307/20512136

Wei, H., Cheng, X., & Zhao, K. (2007). On the relationship between research productivity and teaching effectiveness at research universities. Frontiers of Education in China, 2(2), 298–306. doi:10.1007/s11516-007-0025-8

Wootton, R. (2013). A simple, generalizable method for measuring individual research productivity and its use in the long-term analysis of departmental performance, including between-country comparisons. Health Research Policy and Systems / BioMed Central, 11, 2. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-11-2

Ylijoki, O.-H. (2003). Entangled in Academic Capitalism? A Case-Study on Changing Ideals and Practices of University Research. Higher Education, 45(3), 307–335. doi:10.2307/3447483

Yu, M. L., Hamid, S., Ijab, M. T., & Soo, H. P. (2009). The E-Balanced Scorecard (e-BSC) for Measuring Academic Staff Performance Excellence. Higher Education, 57(6), 813–828. doi:10.2307/40269160

Zaharia, R. M. (2009). Performance of academic research in Romania: The view of academics from Bucharest University of Economics. Transformations in Business and Economics. Retrieved February 24, 2013, from http://www.sinab.unal.edu.co:2066/record/display.url?eid=2-s2.0-72749122746&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&sid=95E894FE72E1AF193C2D7C89DF0B4EB2:10&sot=a&sdt=a&sl=176&s=(TITLE(research+AND+(assessment+OR+performance+OR+productivity))+AND+TITLE(university)+AND+TITLE-ABS-KEY(research+AND+(group+OR+team)))+AND+DOCTYPE(ar+OR+re)+AND+PUBYEAR+>-+1999&relpos=9&relpos=9&searchTerm=(TITLE(research+AND+(assessment+OR+performance+OR+productivity))+AND+TITLE(un