Cómo citar
Resumen
Este capítulo informa sobre el procedimiento utilizado para seleccionar y revisar las fuentes utilizadas en la elaboración de este documento. En el primer apartado se presenta la forma como se seleccionaron y revisaron las fuentes oficiales y no oficiales y, en el segundo, se muestra el mecanismo para revisar los referentes de la literatura internacional y en el tercero están las conclusiones de estos procesos.
De acuerdo con las fuentes de información, este trabajo de investigación acudió a información primaria a partir de las entrevistas realizadas a expertos e investigadores, y a información secundaria de tipo bibliográfica. Es de anotar que, en esta investigación el nivel extensivo de la información es de tipo comparativo. Adicionalmente, los autores asumen una postura como observadores del fenómeno.
Referencias
Abolghassemi, M. A., & Jouyban, A. (2011). Scientometric analysis of the major Iranian medical universities. Scientometrics, 87(1), 205–220. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79952002177&partnerID=40&md5=-657185388caf7526ed9a97ef7f363627
Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2011). The dangers of performance-based research funding in non-competitive higher education systems. Scientometrics, 87(3), 641–654. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0355-4
Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2010). National-scale research performance assessment at the individual level. Scientometrics, 86(2), 347–364. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0297-2
Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2011). National-scale research performance assessment at the individual level. Scientometrics, 86(2), 347–364. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-78650993763&partnerID=40&md5=ac9090ef4cb8464b890d5695d501c63a
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Cicero, T. (2012). What is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance? Scientometrics, 93(3), 1005–1017. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0714-9
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Costa, F. Di. (2009). Research Collaboration and Productivity: Is There Correlation? Higher Education, 57(2), 155–171. doi:10.2307/40269114
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2010). Citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality: Could the latter ever be preferable? Scientometrics, 84(3), 821–833. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77954956331&partnerID=40&md5=4593b58a8027c03f08e34807245a4a89
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2011). A national-scale cross-time analysis of university research performance. Scientometrics, 87(2), 399–413. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0319-0
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2010). National research assessment exercises: A measure of the distortion of performance rankings when labor input is treated as uniform. Scientometrics, 84(3), 605–619. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0164-1
Abrizah, A., & Wee, M. (2011). Malaysia’s Computer Science research productivity based on publications in the Web of Science, 2000-2010, 16(1), 109–124.
Albert, A., Granadino, B., & Plaza, L. (2007). Scientific and technological performance evaluation of the Spanish Council for Scientific Research ( CSIC ) in the field of Biotechnology. Scientometrics, 70(1), 41–51.
Aleixandre-Benavent, R., Valderrama-Zurián, J. C., & González-Alcaide, G. (2007). Scientific journals impact factor: Limitations and alternative indicators. Profesional de La Información, 16(1), 4–11. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-34250160168&partnerID=40&md5=0907e67d338f89c367ed835277729ce3
Álvarez, I. (2012). Entrevista para Informe de Estancia Sabática. In C. Topete-Barrera & S. P. Rojas-Berrio (Eds.), (p. 5). Ciudad de México: Universidad de São Paulo.
Amante Soria, C. (2005, June). Reprueban científicos desempeño del Conacyt. Academia Mexicana de Ciencias, 1–3.
Anderson, M. S. (2001). The Complex Relations between the Academy and Industry: Views from the Literature. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(2), 226–246. doi:10.2307/2649323
Annibaldi, A., Truzzi, C., Illuminati, S., & Scarponi, G. (2010). Scientometric analysis of national university research performance in analytical chemistry on the basis of academic publications: Italy as case study. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 398(1), 17–26. doi:10.1007/s00216-010-3804-7
Arango, P. (2009). La farsa de las publicaciones universitarias. El Malpensante, 97, 3–12.
Azma, F. (2010). Qualitative Indicators for the evaluation of universities performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5408–5411. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.882
Badar, K., Hite, J. M., & Badir, Y. F. (2012). Examining the relationship of co-authorship network centrality and gender on academic research performance: The case of chemistry researchers in Pakistan. Scientometrics, 94(2), 755–775. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0764-z
Barczyński, B. J., & Rek, M. (2011). Evaluation in science - Index Copernicus case study of multi-parametric evaluation system. Archives of Budo, 7(2), 93–103. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79960719602&partnerID=40&md5=98f74c022e4569eab0ab8753a08a7d98
Barham, B., Foltz, J., & Kim, K. (2002). Trends in University Ag-Biotech Patent Production. Review of Agricultural Economics, 24(2), 294–308. doi:10.2307/1349761
Benneworth, P., & Jongbloed, B. W. (2010). Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation. Higher Education, 59(5), 567–588. doi:10.2307/40602420
Bernard, G. W. (2000). History and Research Assessment Exercises. Oxford Review of Education, 26(1), 95–106.
Bilir, S., Göğüş, E., Önal, Ö., Öztürkmen, N. D., & Yontan, T. (2012). Research performance of Turkish astronomers in the period of 1980–2010. Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0922-3
Bordons, M., & Gómez-Fernández, I. (2002). Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country. Scientometrics, 53(2), 195–206.
Bornmann, L., Wallon, G., & Ledin, A. (2008). Is the h index related to (standard) bibliometric measures and to the assessments by peers? An investigation of the h index by using molecular life sciences data. Research Evaluation, 17(2), 149–156. doi:10.3152/095820208X319166
Braam, R., & van den Besselaar, P. (2010). Life cycles of research groups: The case of CWTS. Research Evaluation, 19(3), 173–184.
Bressan, R. a, Gerolin, J., & Mari, J. J. (2005). The modest but growing Brazilian presence in psychiatric, psychobiological and mental health research: Assessment of the 1998-2002 period. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 38(5), 649–59. doi:/S0100-879X2005000500001
Broadhead, L., & Howard, S. (1998). “ The Art of Punishing ”: The Research Assessment Exercise and the Ritualisation of Power in Higher Education, 6(8), 1–14.
Butler, L. (2003). Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts. Research Policy, 32(1), 143–155. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00007-0
Cabral, A. P., & Huet, I. (2012). Contributions for Innovative Institutional Research Quality Assessment Practices and Processes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47(0), 1109–1114. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.787
Cabrera, E., Jiménez, M., Navarrete, J., Pino, J. L., Romero, M. J., Sánchez, S., & Solís, F. (2007). Modelo de evaluación de los grupos de investigación andaluces mediante la construcción de un indicador sintético. In Congreso RICYT (pp. 1–16). Sao Pablo, Brasil. Retrieved from http://congreso.ricyt.org/files/Indicadores de Producción/Modelo de ev grupos de investigacion andaluces.pdf
Calver, M. C., Lilith, M., & Dickman, C. R. (2012). A “perverse incentive” from bibliometrics: Could National Research Assessment Exercises (NRAEs) restrict literature availability for nature conservation? Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0908-1
Calviño, A. M. (2006). Assessment of research performance in food science and technology: Publication behavior of five Iberian-American countries ( 1992 – 2003 ). Scientometrics, 69(1), 103–116.
Canet, E., & Grassy, G. (2006). Optimizing French scientific and economic performance: The Cifre system of public-private partnership in doctoral research and Servier’s contribution. Formation À La Recherche et Partenariats de Recherche Public-Privé: Contribuer Essemble À L’excellence Scvientifique et À La Croissance Économique, 22(6-7), 664–668. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33745925303&partnerID=40&md5=6a965b2fa1e1f066340d3ca44b28d508
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2014 Institución Universitaria Politécnico Grancolombiano